Are Quotas a Solution to Physician Shortages?: In 2019, Taylor Walker, a 25-year-old pregnant woman from a rural Nebraska town of fewer than 500 people, shared her story with NPR. After experiencing pregnancy complications, she had to make a four-hour round trip for medical care—only to find her doctor unavailable. She made that long journey multiple times. For Taylor and millions like her, this isn’t just inconvenient. It’s dangerous.
So how did we get to a point where where you live determines your ability to see a doctor?
The Hidden Gatekeepers: Medical Schools and Admissions Inequities
One key reason lies in how we admit students to medical school. These schools reject most applicants. Yet they have no obligation to align their admissions with the nation’s health care needs. As a result, privilege plays a central role. Nearly half of all medical students come from the wealthiest 20% of families, and most attended just 50 elite feeder colleges.
Meanwhile, applicants from underserved or rural communities face steeper barriers. Although some incentive programs exist, they’ve failed to fill the gaps in high-need areas. If we want to fix this imbalance, we must think bigger.
A Bold Proposal: Socioeconomic Quotas in Admissions
One promising idea is a quota system based on socioeconomic background. No more than 40% of students should come from any single socioeconomic quintile. At least 10% should come from each quintile. This would create more balanced medical school classes and improve representation across the economic spectrum.
To make this work, we would need a “socioeconomic score” for applicants. This score could include factors like household income, parental education, first-generation college status, and whether someone grew up in a physician shortage area. The AAMC could incorporate this into its current tools for evaluating applicants.
This approach would serve two purposes. First, it would increase fairness in medical school access. Second, it would help identify candidates most likely to serve underserved communities after graduation.
Why Representation Drives Results
Data shows that physicians from low-income or rural backgrounds are far more likely to return to underserved communities. These doctors are better attuned to the cultural, economic, and logistical challenges their patients face. They also provide better preventive care, which improves outcomes and reduces costs.
Unlike mandatory service programs, socioeconomic quotas would help select students who already want to practice in these areas. This alignment between training and motivation is critical to long-term retention.
Addressing Concerns About Quality
Some critics worry that quotas would lower academic standards. However, the evidence doesn’t support this concern. Studies show that students from disadvantaged backgrounds perform just as well as wealthier peers once admitted. Graduation and licensing rates are comparable.
Other countries offer useful examples. In the Netherlands, medical schools used partial lottery systems without harming outcomes. India’s more aggressive quota system has also shown promising academic results. Even in the U.S., military academies use geographic quotas to ensure fair representation.
Therefore, equitable admissions and high standards can go hand in hand.
A Measured Rollout with Accountability
Of course, implementing such a change would require care. We should begin with randomized pilot programs to test different quota models. Researchers could track where graduates practice and measure community health outcomes.
Additionally, oversight would be essential. A diverse panel of educators, public health experts, and community leaders should monitor the program and suggest improvements.
This isn’t about lowering the bar. It’s about redefining success in a way that includes service to underserved communities.
A Workforce That Reflects the Nation
For patients like Taylor Walker, this shift could mean local care from a physician who knows and understands her community. It could mean fewer emergencies, better outcomes, and more dignity in receiving care.
Ultimately, quotas offer a practical solution to one of health care’s deepest failures. They don’t solve everything. But they would help build a workforce that reflects—and serves—all Americans.
By Jacob Murphy
Medical Student and Future Rural Health Advocate
Read More from StanfordPhysicianAdvocate.org:
- Transforming Health Care Leadership: Prioritizing Care for Providers and Patients
- The Financial Pressures Reshaping Physician Priorities
- Hidden Crisis in Health Care: How Corporate Greed is Undermining Patient Care
- How Vaccine Hesitancy is Reviving Deadly Childhood Diseases
- How a Coaching Culture Reduces Physician Burnout