In today’s healthcare environment, utilization review delays quietly disrupt the continuity of care—particularly in rural and under-resourced hospitals. While originally designed to reduce unnecessary spending, these reviews now create new risks by slowing down medically necessary treatments. Physicians, especially those in isolated or financially strained settings, are left waiting for insurer approvals while patients suffer in limbo.
The Burden on Rural Hospitals
Rural hospitals often lack the staff and infrastructure to navigate complex utilization reviews. A single delay in pre-approval for a scan or transfer can lead to severe outcomes. In cases involving stroke, trauma, or sepsis, even short utilization review delays may result in permanent harm. These hospitals depend on timely authorization to initiate advanced care, especially when in-house resources are limited.
These hospitals also face workforce shortages, outdated infrastructure, and slower electronic health systems, all of which compound the problem. Even if a physician makes the right call, they’re often stuck in a web of paperwork, peer-to-peer reviews, and documentation loops. The time lost is not just administrative—it’s clinical.
How Delays Undermine Physician Decision-Making
Doctors are trained to make fast, evidence-based decisions. When utilization review delays force clinicians into insurance negotiations during critical moments, patient outcomes suffer. Many physicians spend valuable hours justifying urgent decisions instead of delivering bedside care. This bureaucratic drag frustrates providers and erodes their ability to practice medicine as trained.
Worse, physicians feel as though they are practicing in a system that second-guesses their training. Each delay chips away at the provider-patient relationship. Families ask why their loved one hasn’t received the test or transfer they need. And when the answer is “we’re waiting on approval,” trust erodes—fast.
The Emotional Toll on Clinicians
This environment contributes to rising burnout and professional dissatisfaction. Doctors in high-need areas already face long hours, workforce shortages, and limited resources. The added burden of utilization review delays erodes their sense of purpose and weakens trust in the system. It’s not just a matter of efficiency—it’s a matter of ethics.
A 2021 survey by the American Medical Association found that 93% of physicians reported care delays due to prior authorization, and 34% said it led to serious adverse events. These aren’t statistics—they’re real patients with real consequences. Read more from CMS about prior authorization challenges here.
Policy Solutions Must Prioritize Patient Safety
Healthcare stakeholders must rethink how utilization reviews function, especially for rural and high-acuity care. Policies should allow for automatic approvals in certain urgent cases or implement stricter response time requirements from insurers. Technology-driven preauthorization tools can help, but human oversight with clinical empathy remains essential. Systems should empower—not constrain—those at the bedside.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has acknowledged the negative impact of prolonged prior authorization processes and is testing reforms, including electronic pre-authorization and streamlined workflows. These efforts should expand and focus on protecting patient outcomes.
Speed Saves Lives
Utilization review delays aren’t just administrative slowdowns—they’re critical barriers to care. For physicians on the ground, especially in rural and underfunded hospitals, these delays are more than an inconvenience. They’re dangerous. Reforming the process is no longer a discussion for the future—it’s a necessity today.
Delays in care aren’t just paperwork—they’re patient outcomes. Stand with physicians demanding timely approvals and patient-first policies. Because every second matters.
Learn how you can support clinical decision-making at StanfordPhysicianAdvocate.org
Read More from StanfordPhysicianAdvocate.org:
- FDA Prescription Failures: Impact on Women and Opioid Users
- Urgent Reforms Needed: Addressing the Opioid Crisis and Youth Mental Health in 2025
- A Health Care CEO’s Death Sparks Public Outcry: Unpacking the Reaction
- Navigating the Future of Medical Training in a Politicized Environment
- California Seeks Mental Health Warning Labels on Social Media